Resume-aware faculty matching

Find professors who actually fit you

Upload your resume. Four AI agents analyze your background, rank the faculty who fit, inspect their recent research, and help you draft outreach — grounded in their actual work, not templates.

Free to startNo credit cardCancel anytime
Top matches Balanced preset
Dr. Sarah Chen
Stanford · Interpretability · NLP
91
Dr. Marcus Holloway
MIT · Robotics · RL
84
Dr. Aisha Okonkwo
CMU · Fairness · HCI
82
Nova · Professor Researcher · re-ranking top 20…

Stephen Schneider

· Principal, Director of Adult & Vocational Literacy (BOCES)

Stony Brook University · Department of Educational Leadership

Active 1993–2024

h-index34
Citations4.0k
Papers16476 last 5y
Funding$6.3M1 active
See your match with Stephen Schneider — sign in to PhdFit.Sign in

Research topics

  • Psychology
  • Clinical psychology
  • Medicine
  • Social psychology

Selected publications

  • Influence of ecological momentary assessment study design features on reported willingness to participate and perceptions of potential research studies: an experimental study

    BMJ Open · 2021 · 49 citations

    • Medicine
    • Clinical psychology
    • Psychology

    OBJECTIVE: Intensive ambulatory assessment, such as ecological momentary assessment (EMA), is increasingly used to capture naturalistic patient-reported outcomes. EMA design features (eg, study duration, prompt frequency) vary widely between studies, but it is not known if such design decisions influence potential subjects' willingness to participate in a study. We hypothesise that intentions to participate will be higher in studies that are less burdensome and have higher reward (eg, compensation). DESIGN: This experimental study examined if four EMA study design features (study duration, prompt frequency, prompt length, compensation) affected intentions to participate in a hypothetical EMA study and participation appraisals (eg, participation effort). Participants were randomly assigned to conditions (reflecting a fully crossed design of the four features, each with two levels). Each condition presented a vignette describing a study (each a unique combination of design features) and asked them to report on likelihood of participating and study appraisals. PARTICIPANTS: age=40.39) were recruited using an online service. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes were willingness to participate (No/Yes) and reported participation likelihood (0-100 scale). Secondary outcomes included appraisals of interest, enjoyment, effort, and if the study makes a valuable contribution to science. RESULTS: =83.90, respectively). Shorter study duration, fewer prompts, shorter prompts and higher compensation increased willingness to participate and elicited higher participation likelihood (each associated with ~6%-8% increases). Findings suggested that more intensive studies were judged as somewhat less interesting and enjoyable, and requiring more effort. CONCLUSION: Hypotheses were generally supported. Design features influence behavioural intentions to participate in, and appraisals of, EMA studies. Implications for participant recruitment and generalisability, and remaining research questions, are discussed.

Recent grants

Frequent coauthors

  • Arthur A. Stone

    University of Southern California

    90 shared
  • Doerte U. Junghaenel

    University of Southern California

    64 shared
  • Joan E. Broderick

    University of Southern California

    34 shared
  • Haomiao Jin

    University of Surrey

    31 shared
  • Raymond Hernandez

    University of Southern California

    29 shared
  • Elizabeth A. Pyatak

    University of Southern California

    21 shared
  • Pey-Jiuan Lee

    University of Southern California

    21 shared
  • Jeffrey S. Gonzalez

    Jackson Memorial Hospital

    20 shared

Education

  • PhD, Psychology

    Stony Brook University

    2010
  • Dipl. Psych., Psychology

    Universität Trier

    2001
  • Resume-aware match score
  • Save to shortlist
  • AI-drafted outreach

See your match with Stephen Schneider

PhdFit ranks faculty by your research interests, methods, and publications — grounded in their actual work, not templates.

  • Free to start
  • No credit card
  • 30-second signup