Resume-aware faculty matching

Find professors who actually fit you

Upload your resume. Four AI agents analyze your background, rank the faculty who fit, inspect their recent research, and help you draft outreach — grounded in their actual work, not templates.

Free to startNo credit cardCancel anytime
Top matches Balanced preset
Dr. Sarah Chen
Stanford · Interpretability · NLP
91
Dr. Marcus Holloway
MIT · Robotics · RL
84
Dr. Aisha Okonkwo
CMU · Fairness · HCI
82
Nova · Professor Researcher · re-ranking top 20…
Natasha  Pilkauskas

Natasha Pilkauskas

Verified

University of Michigan · Public Policy

Active 2008–2024

h-index25
Citations1.7k
Papers7030 last 5y
Funding
See your match with Natasha Pilkauskas — sign in to PhdFit.Sign in

Research topics

  • Sociology
  • Economic growth
  • Economics
  • Demographic economics
  • Finance
  • Computer Science
  • Political Science
  • Geography
  • Psychiatry
  • Business
  • Medicine
  • Socioeconomics
  • Demography
  • Psychology
  • Actuarial science
  • Gerontology
  • Econometrics

Selected publications

  • The COVID Cash Transfer Study: The Impacts of a One‐Time Unconditional Cash Transfer on the Well‐Being of Families Receiving SNAP in Twelve States

    Journal of Policy Analysis and Management · 2023 · 34 citations

    1st authorCorresponding
    • Sociology
    • Demographic economics
    • Economics

    Abstract There is growing interest in the use of unconditional cash transfers as a means to alleviate poverty, yet little is known about the effects of such transfers in the U.S. This paper reports on the results of a randomized controlled study of a one‐time $1,000 unconditional cash transfer in May 2020 to families with low incomes in 12 U.S. states. The families were receiving, or had recently received, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program benefits. We examine the impact of the cash transfer on five pre‐registered outcomes (material hardship, mental health, parenting, child behavior, partner relationships) and several secondary outcomes (hardship avoidance, consumption, employment, benefit use). We find no statistically significant effects (powered to detect effects of 0.09 standard deviations) of the cash transfer on any outcomes for the full sample. In pre‐specified exploratory analyses, we find significant reductions in material hardship (‐0.17 standard deviations) among families with less than $500 of earnings in the previous month, roughly the bottom 50 percent of monthly earnings for the study sample.

  • The COVID-19 Cash Transfer Study II: The Hardship and Mental Health Impacts of an Unconditional Cash Transfer to Low-Income Individuals

    National Tax Journal · 2022 · 29 citations

    • Computer Science
    • Economics
    • Demographic economics

    This paper reports findings from a randomized controlled trial of a one-time, $1,000 unconditional cash transfer to low-income households in October 2020. We use a combination of administrative and survey data collected six weeks posttreatment to examine four preregistered hypotheses: impacts on material hardship and mental health in the full study sample as well as among a very low-income sample. We find no effects of the cash transfer on any of the prespecified or other exploratory outcomes. We explore various explanations for these null results and discuss implications for future research on unconditional cash transfer programs.

  • Historical Trends in Children Living in Multigenerational Households in the United States: 1870–2018

    Demography · 2020 · 82 citations

    1st authorCorresponding
    • Political Science
    • Sociology
    • Demography

    Over the last two decades, the share of U.S. children under age 18 who live in a multigenerational household (with a grandparent and parent) has increased dramatically. Yet we do not know whether this increase is a recent phenomenon or a return to earlier levels of coresidence. Using data from the decennial census from 1870 to 2010 and the 2018 American Community Survey, we examine historical trends in children's multigenerational living arrangements, differences by race/ethnicity and education, and factors that explain the observed trends. We find that in 2018, 10% of U.S. children lived in a multigenerational household, a return to levels last observed in 1950. The current increase in multigenerational households began in 1980, when only 5% of children lived in such a household. Few differences in the prevalence of multigenerational coresidence by race/ethnicity or education existed in the early part of the twentieth century; racial/ethnic and education differences in coresidence are a more recent phenomena. Decomposition analyses do little to explain the decline in coresidence between 1940 and 1980, suggesting that unmeasured factors explain the decrease. Declines in marriage and in the share of White children most strongly explained the increase in multigenerational coresidence between 1980 and 2018. For White children with highly educated parents, factors explaining the increase in coresidence differ from other groups. Our findings suggest that the links between race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status and multigenerational coresidence have changed over time, and today the link between parental education and coresidence varies within racial/ethnic groups.

Frequent coauthors

  • Katherine Michelmore

    University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

    23 shared
  • Rachel Dunifon

    Cornell University

    12 shared
  • Irwin Garfinkel

    7 shared
  • H. Luke Shaefer

    University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

    5 shared
  • Nicole Kovski

    5 shared
  • Jeanne Brooks‐Gunn

    Columbia University

    5 shared
  • Phoebe Trout

    Ford Motor Company (United States)

    4 shared
  • Sara McLanahan

    4 shared
  • Resume-aware match score
  • Save to shortlist
  • AI-drafted outreach

See your match with Natasha Pilkauskas

PhdFit ranks faculty by your research interests, methods, and publications — grounded in their actual work, not templates.

  • Free to start
  • No credit card
  • 30-second signup