Resume-aware faculty matching

Find professors who actually fit you

Upload your resume. Four AI agents analyze your background, rank the faculty who fit, inspect their recent research, and help you draft outreach — grounded in their actual work, not templates.

Free to startNo credit cardCancel anytime
Top matches Balanced preset
Dr. Sarah Chen
Stanford · Interpretability · NLP
91
Dr. Marcus Holloway
MIT · Robotics · RL
84
Dr. Aisha Okonkwo
CMU · Fairness · HCI
82
Nova · Professor Researcher · re-ranking top 20…
James F. A. Traniello

James F. A. Traniello

· Professor of BiologyVerified

Boston University · Biology

Active 1977–2026

h-index59
Citations9.0k
Papers19724 last 5y
Funding$2.3M
See your match with James F. A. Traniello — sign in to PhdFit.Sign in

About

James F. A. Traniello is a Professor of Biology at Boston University, with a PhD from Harvard University. His research focuses on the behavioral mechanisms, ecology, and evolution of social behavior in insects, particularly social insects such as ants. He studies collective intelligence, division of labor, and their influence on brain evolution, exploring the neuroanatomy and neurochemistry of social behavior through techniques like immunohistochemistry, confocal microscopy, high-performance liquid chromatography, and pharmacological interventions. His work aims to understand the neurobiology of social structure in relation to ecology and evolution, connecting sociobiology, neurobiology, physiology, gerontology, and ecology to examine the evolutionary forces shaping social brain development. His research includes investigating the evolution and neural architecture of the social brain, measuring its metabolic rate, and exploring the genomics of social brain evolution.

Research topics

  • Computer Science
  • Biology
  • Neuroscience
  • Ecology
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Evolutionary biology
  • Optics
  • Physics
  • Genetics
  • Paleontology

Selected publications

  • The future of evolutionary behavioral biology

    Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology · 2026-05-01

    articleOpen access
  • Behavioral ecology and sociobiology since 1975: The growth and diversification of the biology of adaptive social behavior

    Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology · 2026-03-01 · 1 citations

    articleOpen access1st authorCorresponding
  • Sociobiology and the transformation of evolutionary behavioral biology

    Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology · 2026-03-01 · 1 citations

    articleOpen access1st authorCorresponding
  • Gustatory socioecology: The evolution, ecology, and mechanisms of taste in eusocial insects

    Advances in insect physiology · 2025-01-01

    book-chapterSenior author
  • The neurobiology of collective behavior: Lessons from honeybees and ants

    Elsevier eBooks · 2025-01-01

    book-chapterSenior author
  • The science funding crisis threatens the careers of future behavioral ecologists

    Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology · 2025-10-21

    articleOpen accessSenior author
  • Insect Behavioral Science in 2025: The New Editor’s Perspective on the Journal of Insect Behavior

    Journal of Insect Behavior · 2025-04-05

    articleOpen access1st authorCorresponding
  • Differential Neuroanatomical, Neurochemical, and Behavioral Impacts of Early-Age Isolation in a Eusocial Insect

    Brain Behavior and Evolution · 2024-06-10 · 4 citations

    articleSenior author

    INTRODUCTION: Social experience early in life appears to be necessary for the development of species-typical behavior. Although isolation during critical periods of maturation has been shown to impact behavior by altering gene expression and brain development in invertebrates and vertebrates, workers of some ant species appear resilient to social deprivation and other neurobiological challenges that occur during senescence or due to loss of sensory input. It is unclear if and to what degree neuroanatomy, neurochemistry, and behavior will show deficiencies if social experience in the early adult life of worker ants is compromised. METHODS: We reared newly eclosed adult workers of Camponotus floridanus under conditions of social isolation for 2-53 days, quantified brain compartment volumes, recorded biogenic amine levels in individual brains, and evaluated movement and behavioral performance to compare the neuroanatomy, neurochemistry, brood-care behavior, and foraging (predatory behavior) of isolated workers with that of workers experiencing natural social contact after adult eclosion. RESULTS: We found that the volume of the antennal lobe, which processes olfactory inputs, was significantly reduced in workers isolated for an average of 40 days, whereas the size of the mushroom bodies, centers of higher-order sensory processing, increased after eclosion and was not significantly different from controls. Titers of the neuromodulators serotonin, dopamine, and octopamine remained stable and were not significantly different in isolation treatments and controls. Brood care, predation, and overall movement were reduced in workers lacking social contact early in life. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that the behavioral development of isolated workers of C. floridanus is specifically impacted by a reduction in the size of the antennal lobe. Task performance and locomotor ability therefore appear to be sensitive to a loss of social contact through a reduction of olfactory processing ability rather than change in the size of the mushroom bodies, which serve important functions in learning and memory, or the central complex, which controls movement.

  • Diversity of ground-dwelling ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in primary and secondary forests in Amazonian Ecuador

    Österreichische Gesellschaft für Entomofaunistik (OEGEF) · 2024-07-09 · 12 citations

    articleOpen accessSenior author

    An inventory of the ground-dwelling ant faunas of primary and secondary forests at the Tiputini Biodiversity Station in Amazonian Ecuador revealed a total of 101 ant species in 32 genera. Eighty species were collected from the primary forest, while 65 species were collected from the secondary forest. Species overlap between the two sites was low (42.6%) and the composition was significantly different (p < 0.0001). Actual species richness was estimated to be 126 species for primary forest and 110 for secondary forest. The most species-rich genus in both habitats was Pheidole (21 species), which was also the most widespread genus, occurring in 38 of 40 collection sites. In the primary forest, in addition to Pheidole (18 species), the most species-rich genera were Crematogaster (8 species) and Pachycondyla (7 species), whereas Pheidole (17 species), Camponotus (5 species), and Pachycondyla (5 species) were the most species-rich genera in the secondary forest. These results are consistent with past studies showing that the number of ant species in secondary forest increases with time from disturbance and may approach that of primary forest within several decades, but that species composition may take significantly longer to resemble that of the original ant assemblage. The prevalence of different ant functional groups in the two habitats is discussed and the results compared to similar studies in Australia and North America.

  • Correction to: Individual and collective cognition in social insects: what’s in a name?

    Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology · 2024-01-19

    articleOpen access1st authorCorresponding

Recent grants

Frequent coauthors

  • Rebeca B. Rosengaus

    Northeastern University

    30 shared
  • Sara Arganda

    Boston University

    27 shared
  • Mario L. Muscedere

    Boston University

    18 shared
  • Ignacio Arganda‐Carreras

    Fundación Biofísica Bizkaia

    15 shared
  • Darcy G. Gordon

    Massachusetts Institute of Technology

    14 shared
  • Daniel V. Calleri

    University of Chicago

    13 shared
  • Isabella B. Muratore

    Boston University

    12 shared
  • Simon K. A. Robson

    Central Queensland University

    11 shared

Awards & honors

  • Oboh-Weilke Postdoctoral Travel Award
  • Resume-aware match score
  • Save to shortlist
  • AI-drafted outreach

See your match with James F. A. Traniello

PhdFit ranks faculty by your research interests, methods, and publications — grounded in their actual work, not templates.

  • Free to start
  • No credit card
  • 30-second signup