Resume-aware faculty matching

Find professors who actually fit you

Upload your resume. Four AI agents analyze your background, rank the faculty who fit, inspect their recent research, and help you draft outreach — grounded in their actual work, not templates.

Free to startNo credit cardCancel anytime
Top matches Balanced preset
Dr. Sarah Chen
Stanford · Interpretability · NLP
91
Dr. Marcus Holloway
MIT · Robotics · RL
84
Dr. Aisha Okonkwo
CMU · Fairness · HCI
82
Nova · Professor Researcher · re-ranking top 20…

Nathaniel K Jones

Verified

University of Pennsylvania · Rehabilitation Medicine

Active 1992–2024

h-index31
Citations5.7k
Papers191104 last 5y
Funding
See your match with Nathaniel K Jones — sign in to PhdFit.Sign in

Research topics

  • Sociology
  • Political Science
  • Psychiatry
  • Medicine
  • Psychology
  • Psychotherapist
  • Environmental health
  • Business
  • Clinical psychology
  • Social psychology

Selected publications

  • Investigating the impact of involuntary psychiatric hospitalization on youth and young adult trust and help-seeking in pathways to care

    Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology · 2021 · 86 citations

    1st authorCorresponding
    • Psychiatry
    • Psychology
    • Medicine
  • Structural Disadvantage and Culture, Race, and Ethnicity in Early Psychosis Services: International Provider Survey

    Psychiatric Services · 2021 · 37 citations

    1st authorCorresponding
    • Sociology
    • Political Science
    • Psychology

    OBJECTIVE: Little is known about provider perspectives on programmatic responses to structural disadvantage and cultural differences within early intervention in psychosis (EIP) services, programs, and models. The primary objective of this study was to investigate providers' perspectives on the impacts of disadvantage and minority race, ethnicity, and culture and to describe current practices and perceived gaps and concerns. METHODS: An online survey of specialized EIP providers was disseminated in the United Kingdom, United States, Canada, Australia, and Chile. A total of 164 providers, representing 110 unique sites, completed the survey. Closed-ended questions gathered demographic and program data, including information on formal assessment of trauma or adversity, integration of trauma-informed care, integration of formal cultural assessment tools, training focused on culture, programmatic changes to address culture-related issues, and consultation with cultural insiders. Open-ended questions addressed the demographic mix of the program's client population; the perceived role and influence of trauma, structural disadvantage, and cultural differences; and concerns and needs related to these topics. Frequencies were examined for closed-ended items; open-ended responses were systematically coded. RESULTS: Overall, survey findings suggested low levels of implementation of a variety of assessment and support practices related to cultural diversity in EIP programs. Coding of open-ended responses revealed numerous concerns regarding the impacts of disadvantage and cultural difference on clients and perceived gaps in policy and implementation. CONCLUSIONS: An expansion of research and service development aimed at better meeting the disadvantage- and culture-related needs of young people with early psychosis and their families should be a priority for the field.

Frequent coauthors

  • Marie Brown

    Human Services Research Institute

    50 shared
  • Franco Mascayano

    New York Psychoanalytic Society and Institute

    49 shared
  • Lisa B. Dixon

    Columbia University

    43 shared
  • Michelle Colder Carras

    41 shared
  • Shannon Pagdon

    University of Virginia

    38 shared
  • Iruma Bello

    Columbia University Irving Medical Center

    34 shared
  • Melanie M. Wall

    New York State Psychiatric Institute

    33 shared
  • Yaara Zisman‐Ilani

    Temple University

    33 shared
  • Resume-aware match score
  • Save to shortlist
  • AI-drafted outreach

See your match with Nathaniel K Jones

PhdFit ranks faculty by your research interests, methods, and publications — grounded in their actual work, not templates.

  • Free to start
  • No credit card
  • 30-second signup