Resume-aware faculty matching

Find professors who actually fit you

Upload your resume. Four AI agents analyze your background, rank the faculty who fit, inspect their recent research, and help you draft outreach — grounded in their actual work, not templates.

Free to startNo credit cardCancel anytime
Top matches Balanced preset
Dr. Sarah Chen
Stanford · Interpretability · NLP
91
Dr. Marcus Holloway
MIT · Robotics · RL
84
Dr. Aisha Okonkwo
CMU · Fairness · HCI
82
Nova · Professor Researcher · re-ranking top 20…
Dexter Locke

Dexter Locke

Verified

Yale University · Environmental Health

Active 1994–2024

h-index29
Citations2.9k
Papers11162 last 5y
Funding
See your match with Dexter Locke — sign in to PhdFit.Sign in

Research topics

  • Geography
  • Ecology
  • Sociology
  • Political Science
  • Environmental planning
  • Environmental resource management
  • Environmental science
  • Business
  • Economics
  • Engineering
  • Psychology
  • Socioeconomics
  • Economic growth
  • Medicine
  • Forestry
  • Biology
  • Agroforestry
  • Transport engineering
  • Mathematics
  • Marketing
  • Civil engineering
  • Demography

Selected publications

  • USDA Forest Service Employee Diversity During a Period of Workforce Contraction

    Journal of Forestry · 2022 · 29 citations

    • Political Science
    • Sociology
    • Business
  • Residential yard management and landscape cover affect urban bird community diversity across the continental USA

    Ecological Applications · 2021 · 69 citations

    • Ecology
    • Geography
    • Agroforestry

    Urbanization has a homogenizing effect on biodiversity and leads to communities with fewer native species and lower conservation value. However, few studies have explored whether or how land management by urban residents can ameliorate the deleterious effects of this homogenization on species composition. We tested the effects of local (land management) and neighborhood-scale (impervious surface and tree canopy cover) features on breeding bird diversity in six US metropolitan areas that differ in regional species pools and climate. We used a Bayesian multiregion community model to assess differences in species richness, functional guild richness, community turnover, population vulnerability, and public interest in each bird community in six land management types: two natural area park types (separate and adjacent to residential areas), two yard types with conservation features (wildlife-certified and water conservation) and two lawn-dominated yard types (high- and low-fertilizer application), and surrounding neighborhood-scale features. Species richness was higher in yards compared with parks; however, parks supported communities with high conservation scores while yards supported species of high public interest. Bird communities in all land management types were composed of primarily native species. Within yard types, species richness was strongly and positively associated with neighborhood-scale tree canopy cover and negatively associated with impervious surface. At a continental scale, community turnover between cities was lowest in yards and highest in parks. Within cities, however, turnover was lowest in high-fertilizer yards and highest in wildlife-certified yards and parks. Our results demonstrate that, across regions, preserving natural areas, minimizing impervious surfaces and increasing tree canopy are essential strategies to conserve regionally important species. However, yards, especially those managed for wildlife support diverse, heterogeneous bird communities with high public interest and potential to support species of conservation concern. Management approaches that include the preservation of protected parks, encourage wildlife-friendly yards and acknowledge how public interest in local birds can advance successful conservation in American residential landscapes.

  • The influence of street trees on pedestrian perceptions of safety: Results from environmental justice areas of Massachusetts, U.S.

    Urban forestry & urban greening · 2021 · 34 citations

    • Sociology
    • Geography
    • Transport engineering
  • Beyond ‘trees are good’: Disservices, management costs, and tradeoffs in urban forestry

    AMBIO · 2020 · 302 citations

    • Political Science
    • Environmental planning
    • Business
  • Conceptualizing social-ecological drivers of change in urban forest patches

    Urban Ecosystems · 2020 · 66 citations

    • Environmental resource management
    • Ecology
    • Geography
  • Municipal regulation of residential landscapes across US cities: Patterns and implications for landscape sustainability

    Journal of Environmental Management · 2020 · 60 citations

    • Environmental planning
    • Business
    • Environmental resource management

Frequent coauthors

  • Peter M. Groffman

    The Graduate Center, CUNY

    48 shared
  • J. Morgan Grove

    43 shared
  • Jarlath O’Neil‐Dunne

    Oregon State University

    24 shared
  • Colleen Murphy-Dunning

    Yale University

    22 shared
  • Susannah B. Lerman

    17 shared
  • Amanda Phillips de Lucas

    US Forest Service

    16 shared
  • Kristen C. Nelson

    Minnesota Department of Natural Resources

    16 shared
  • Giovanni Zinn

    New Haven Public Schools

    16 shared

Education

  • none: graduate course in Data Science, Professional Studies

    University of Maryland Baltimore County

    2021
  • Postdoctoral Fellowship

    National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center

    2019
  • PhD Geography, Graduate School of Geography

    Clark University

    2017
  • MA Geography, Graduate School of Geography

    Clark University

    2016
  • MESc Environmental Science

    Yale University School of Forestry and Environmental Studies

    2013
  • none: graduate course in Spatial Data Analysis, Geography

    Hunter College

    2010
  • BS Natural Resources Planning, Rubenstein School of Environment & Natural Resources

    University of Vermont

    2009
  • Resume-aware match score
  • Save to shortlist
  • AI-drafted outreach

See your match with Dexter Locke

PhdFit ranks faculty by your research interests, methods, and publications — grounded in their actual work, not templates.

  • Free to start
  • No credit card
  • 30-second signup