Resume-aware faculty matching

Find professors who actually fit you

Upload your resume. Four AI agents analyze your background, rank the faculty who fit, inspect their recent research, and help you draft outreach — grounded in their actual work, not templates.

Free to startNo credit cardCancel anytime
Top matches Balanced preset
Dr. Sarah Chen
Stanford · Interpretability · NLP
91
Dr. Marcus Holloway
MIT · Robotics · RL
84
Dr. Aisha Okonkwo
CMU · Fairness · HCI
82
Nova · Professor Researcher · re-ranking top 20…
Steven Klose

Steven Klose

· Professor and Associate Head for Ext

Texas A&M University · Agricultural Economics

Active 1996–2021

h-index10
Citations834
Papers1261 last 5y
Funding
See your match with Steven Klose — sign in to PhdFit.Sign in

About

Steven L. Klose, Ph.D., is a Professor and Extension Economist in the Department of Agricultural Economics at Texas A&M University, serving as Associate Head for Extension. His primary responsibility is coordinating the FARM Assistance program, an intensive extension effort that provides strategic planning and risk management analysis to agricultural producers on an individual basis. Over more than 20 years, this program has supported more than 2,700 crop and livestock operations across Texas and has been recognized as a Distinguished/Outstanding Extension Program by multiple agricultural economics associations. Dr. Klose's expertise includes farm management, crop insurance, financial planning, strategic planning, and agricultural policy. He coordinates enterprise budget publications, the Texas Custom Rates project, and contributes as a topic editor for Southern Ag Today. Additionally, he is a member of the Agricultural and Food Policy Center, where he researches the implications of policy alternatives on farms and ranches nationwide.

Research topics

  • Medicine
  • Archaeology
  • Geography

Selected publications

  • Analyzing the Impact of COVID-19 on Texas High Plains Agriculture

    Western Economics Forum · 2021

    • Geography
    • Archaeology
    • Medicine

    Texas High Plains producers faced many new uncertainties with the arrival of COVID-19. Significant supply chain disruptions, reductions in consumer demand and decreases in travel negatively affected agricultural operations. In addition, efforts taken to stem contagion lessened the amount of food consumed away from home, and restrictions on movement sharply reduced gasoline usage, and with it demand for grain ethanol. Elevated cases among livestock processing facilities disrupted normal business practices and increased costs. In fact, early in the pandemic the Texas High Plains region was considered a COVID-19 “hot spot” as many area processing plants faced reduced workforces and slower production times due to high numbers of positive cases. This study looks at the farm-level impacts of COVID-19 on six case study model operations created by local Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Risk Management Specialists.

  • Economic Impact of Beef Cattle Best Management Practices in South Texas: Stocking Strategies during Drought

    Journal of Applied Farm Economics · 2018-05-01 · 2 citations

    articleOpen accessSenior author

    In a drought situation, forage is normally reduced due to lack of adequate moisture. Moreover, the availability of hay may become limited, and hay prices often escalate. Cow-calf producers are faced with the integral decision to maintain their herds and supplemental feed or reduce the herd to minimize feeding requirements and costs. The management decision to maintain versus destock can significantly impact producer profits and financial position. This paper illustrates the financial implications of alternative management stocking strategies in a drought situation optimizing profitability of ranching operations.

  • Factors Affecting Changes in Managerial Decisions

    Agribusiness · 2017-02-07 · 3 citations

    articleSenior author

    ABSTRACT It is commonly held that revealed managerial decisions depend on the interaction of risk attitudes and preferences, as well as market and firm conditions. In agriculture, production plans can have a horizon of a few months to several years. However, it is not always the case that managers follow through on their plans once established. The purpose of this paper is to investigate factors that contribute to changes between managers’ planned decisions and eventual actions. A unique dataset consisting of farm financial data, consultant generated production plans, and a follow‐up producer survey was constructed with participants in the Texas FARM‐Assistance program. We evaluate the effects of managers’ behavioral attributes, farm financial indicators, and production characteristics on the decision to follow through on business plans. Our findings provide new insights into the decision‐making and planning processes of managers under risky market conditions, and the interactions of same with behavioral characteristics. [EconLit citations: Q12; Q13; Q14; D22; G02].

  • Profitability of Beef Cattle Best Management Practices in South Texas: Reproductive Management

    RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · 2016-01-01

    preprintOpen access

    Cow-calf producers are expanding herds in response to high cattle prices and better forage conditions across Texas. Reproductive management practices such as pregnancy testing, bull breeding soundness exams (BSE), and vaccinations for reproductive diseases are important practices that can increase the number of live calves born and weaned, and profits.

  • USDA Commodity Costs and Returns (CAR) and Monthly Milk Cost-of-Production (COP): A 2016 Data Product Review and Proposals for Change, Staff Paper P16-4

    2016-09-01

    article
  • USDA Commodity Costs and Returns (CAR) and Monthly Milk Cost-of-Production (COP): A 2016 Data Product Review and Proposals for Change

    AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA) · 2016-01-01

    articleOpen access
  • USDA Commodity Costs and Returns (CAR) and Monthly Milk Cost-of-Production (COP): A 2016 Data Product Review and Proposals for Change

    RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · 2016-09-01

    preprint

    Farm Management, Production Economics, Research and Development/Tech Change/Emerging Technologies

  • Reoptimization or Bias? Factors Affecting Changes in Production Decisions of Farmers

    AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA) · 2015-01-01

    articleOpen access

    The decisions of managers aim to maximize profit. In agriculture, depending on the crop, production plans can have a horizon between a few months and several years. However, it is not always the case that managers follow their production plans once they have been established. This is because the information set available to the manager may change over time. The new information may be significant enough as to reconsider the original plan. The reassessment of the production plan depends mainly on the effect that new information has on expected profit, risk perceptions, and risk attitudes. Accordingly, this paper analyzes the variables that contribute to the manager’s decision to update his or her production plan. In particular, we evaluate the effects of managers’ behavioral attributes, farm financial indicators, and production characteristics, on the decision to revise their initial production plans. Our findings provide new insights into the decision-making process of farm and ranch managers, including their expected behavior under different market conditions as well as information processing methods.

  • Reoptimization or Bias? Factors Affecting Changes in Production Decisions of Farmers

    RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · 2015-01-01

    preprint

    The decisions of managers aim to maximize profit. In agriculture, depending on the crop, production plans can have a horizon between a few months and several years. However, it is not always the case that managers follow their production plans once they have been established. This is because the information set available to the manager may change over time. The new information may be significant enough as to reconsider the original plan. The reassessment of the production plan depends mainly on the effect that new information has on expected profit, risk perceptions, and risk attitudes. Accordingly, this paper analyzes the variables that contribute to the manager’s decision to update his or her production plan. In particular, we evaluate the effects of managers’ behavioral attributes, farm financial indicators, and production characteristics, on the decision to revise their initial production plans. Our findings provide new insights into the decision-making process of farm and ranch managers, including their expected behavior under different market conditions as well as information processing methods.

  • Focus Assistance FARM

    2014-01-01

    articleSenior author

Frequent coauthors

  • Joe L. Outlaw

    Texas A&M University

    90 shared
  • James W. Richardson

    63 shared
  • David P. Anderson

    43 shared
  • J. Marc Raulston

    Texas A&M University

    43 shared
  • Brian K. Herbst

    39 shared
  • George M. Knapek

    36 shared
  • David P. Anderson

    30 shared
  • P. A. Feldman

    29 shared

Education

  • B.S., Agricultural Economics

    Texas A&M University

  • M.S., Agricultural Economics

    Texas A&M University

  • Ph.D., Agricultural Economics

    Texas A&M University

Awards & honors

  • Distinguished/Outstanding Extension Program by the Agricultu…
  • Distinguished/Outstanding Extension Program by the Western A…
  • Distinguished/Outstanding Extension Program by the Southern…
  • Resume-aware match score
  • Save to shortlist
  • AI-drafted outreach

See your match with Steven Klose

PhdFit ranks faculty by your research interests, methods, and publications — grounded in their actual work, not templates.

  • Free to start
  • No credit card
  • 30-second signup